“There is not any ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any of your present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din saw firstly the deceased and after a ways they saw the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not necessarily mean that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. Such evidence cannot be treated as evidence of previous found.
93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to the main case, Additionally it is a well-set up proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings over the evidence.
Case files may also be accessed from the public access terminals in the clerk’s office on the court where the case was filed.
This unfortunate ambiguity results during the law regarding murder and manslaughter being repugnant with Each individual other.
three. I have heard the learned counsel for your parties and have long gone through the record of this case with their ready assistance.
Article 27 of the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination on the time of appointment of service but after the appointment as well. The disparity while in the pay scale allowances of Stenographers from the District Judiciary is within the apparent negation on the law laid down because of the Supreme Court in its different pronouncements. Read more
Retribution: Section 302 PPC also serves the purpose of retribution, where society seeks justice with the loss of a life. It allows the legal system to impose a proportional punishment over the offender, making certain They are really held accountable for their actions.
whether even though granting promotion senior employees were regarded for promotion or otherwise and submit the compliance report.(Promotion)
Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it calls for legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be developed and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited check here sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability within the matter, but could not be answerable in almost any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this kind of ruling, the defendants took their request into the appellate court.
The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to generally be gathered because of the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
share or interest of the co-owner in immovable property may sold to another co-owner/co-sharer or even to an stranger and section 44(Transfer of Property Act 1882)
a hundred and fifteen . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance with the respondents that pensionary benefits may very well be withheld on account of your allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section twenty of the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does offer for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced. These contain if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may very well be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension could be withheld or reduced. In a few cases, a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established from the government.